Rules and pricing last verified: July 31, 2026, 7:07 AM MDT
The practical answer: choose Bulenox Option 1 if you want full contract size immediately, no separate daily loss limit, and can manage a drawdown that follows both realized and unrealized intraday peaks. Choose Option 2 if end-of-day drawdown accounting is more important than unrestricted starting size and you accept a scaling ladder plus a daily loss control.
The account size, monthly list price, profit target, and maximum drawdown amount are the same for both options on Bulenox’s current enrollment page. The decision is therefore about when the risk threshold moves and how position size is controlled, not about buying a larger headline balance for the same price.
Both are Qualification Accounts. Passing leads to a Bulenox Master Account, not directly to a live brokerage account. Bulenox separately says a trader may be moved to a real-capital Funded Account after three successful Master payouts, subject to the sole discretion of its Risk Management Department.
Quick decision
| Your priority | Better starting fit | Why | Main trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full advertised contract allowance from the first trade | Option 1 | No scaling plan | Intraday trailing includes unrealized gains, so open profit can tighten the floor |
| Risk threshold updated from end-of-day highs | Option 2 | EOD drawdown does not ratchet with every intraday peak | Contract size begins below the headline maximum and expands with cash on hand |
| No separate daily loss limit | Option 1 | The public rule page lists none | The real-time trailing threshold remains the hard account boundary |
| A session-level stop that does not automatically fail the account | Option 2 | Reaching the daily limit suspends trading for the rest of the day; Bulenox says it is not a rule violation | It can interrupt a strategy before the EOD drawdown is reached |
| Large intraday unrealized swings | Option 2, usually | EOD ratcheting is less sensitive to an intraday peak that later fades | Daily-loss and scaling controls still apply |
| Simple position sizing | Option 1 | One maximum contract allowance by account size | Simpler sizing does not make the trailing drawdown easier |
Neither option is universally easier. Option 1 is operationally simpler but less forgiving of unrealized peak giveback. Option 2 is drawdown-friendlier intraday but adds two controls that Option 1 does not have.
Current account sizes, targets, and list prices
| Account | Monthly list price | Profit target | Maximum drawdown | Maximum contracts shown |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25K | $145 | $1,500 | $1,500 | 3 |
| 50K | $175 | $3,000 | $2,500 | 7 |
| 100K | $215 | $6,000 | $3,000 | 12 |
| 150K | $325 | $9,000 | $4,500 | 15 |
| 250K | $535 | $15,000 | $5,500 | 25 |
These are the current list prices on Bulenox’s public enrollment form, checked July 31, 2026. The homepage also displayed $125 for 50K with code $50OFF and $155 for 100K with code $60OFF. Because the public card places Option 1 and Option 2 selection links beside the same promotional display but does not clearly state checkout scope in the reviewed copy, this article does not treat those discounts as a deciding input. Confirm the selected option, code, and final total at checkout.
The help center mentions a 10K Option 2 account in older rule material, but the reviewed public enrollment form lists 25K through 250K for both options. This guide covers the products visibly enrollable on July 31 and does not present 10K as currently available.
How Option 1 works
Option 1 is Bulenox’s No Scaling Account with a trailing drawdown. Its loss threshold follows the highest account balance in real time, including unrealized profit and commissions.
Consider a 100K account with a $3,000 trailing drawdown:
- At the untouched starting balance, the threshold is $97,000.
- If open equity rises to $100,800, the threshold moves to $97,800.
- If that open profit then falls and the trade closes at $100,500, the threshold does not move back down.
That last point is the risk. A profitable open trade can permanently lift the loss floor before the profit is realized. Traders who let winners retrace need to model the threshold against peak intraday equity, not only closed balance.
Option 1 has no scaling ladder and no separate daily loss limit in the current public rules. The trader can use the account-size contract allowance immediately, subject to the overall trailing threshold and the rule that positions must be flat before 15:59 Central Time.
Option 1 is a better fit when
- the strategy uses stable stops and rarely gives back large unrealized gains;
- immediate access to the full contract allowance matters;
- a separate daily loss limit would disrupt valid trading; and
- the trader actively monitors real-time peak equity.
Option 1 is a poor fit when
- open profit often expands and retraces before exit;
- the trader thinks “no daily loss limit” means losses are unconstrained; or
- position size tends to increase automatically just because the full allowance is available.
How Option 2 works
Option 2 combines three features: end-of-day drawdown, a dynamic scaling plan, and a daily loss limit.
The drawdown threshold moves only when the account closes a trading day at a new high. Using Bulenox’s 100K example with a $3,000 drawdown:
- A day ending at $101,000 moves the threshold to $98,000.
- A later day ending at $100,500 does not lower it.
- A day ending at $102,500 moves it to $99,500.
Intraday profit that disappears before the close does not itself ratchet the EOD threshold. That is the main advantage over Option 1.
The trade-off is scaling. A 100K Option 2 account begins with a three-contract maximum while cash on hand is $0–$2,000. The limit rises to five, then eight, then the full 12 as the account crosses the published profit bands. The other sizes have their own ladders.
Option 2 also applies a daily loss limit calculated from realized and unrealized P&L, including commissions:
| Account | Daily loss limit |
|---|---|
| 25K | $500 |
| 50K | $1,100 |
| 100K | $2,200 |
| 150K | $3,300 |
| 250K | $4,500 |
Bulenox says reaching the daily loss limit suspends the account for the remainder of that trading day and does not count as an account-rule violation. Trading resumes the next day. That makes it different from breaching the maximum drawdown, which closes the account.
Option 2 is a better fit when
- the strategy needs room for unrealized intraday fluctuation;
- gradual position growth is acceptable;
- an enforced session stop is useful; and
- the trader values end-of-day threshold updates more than immediate full size.
Option 2 is a poor fit when
- the strategy needs the full headline contract allowance from day one;
- normal intraday movement can reach the published daily limit; or
- the trader is likely to confuse temporary daily suspension with the separate maximum-drawdown failure.
What is the same during qualification?
Both options use the same current monthly list price, target, drawdown amount, and account-size range. Both permit standard and micro contracts, with one standard contract counted as ten micros. Both require positions to be flat before 15:59 CT.
Bulenox states that there is no fixed multi-day minimum to reach the Master Account. A separate help entry says review begins after the target is reached and at least one trading day is complete. Read those together: there is no two-, five-, or ten-day evaluation minimum, but a zero-day pass is impossible and the completed trading day must appear in the report.
Qualification subscriptions renew every 30 days until canceled. A failed account can be reset for $78 before the billing date; Bulenox also describes a free reset at the regular renewal date. A reset does not extend the subscription expiration date.
What changes after passing?
Passing either option leads to a Master Account using the corresponding trailing or EOD drawdown type. The public rules say the drawdown stops moving when it reaches the initial starting balance plus $100. Master Accounts cannot be reset.
The current one-time Master activation fees are the same for both options:
| Account | One-time Master activation fee |
|---|---|
| 25K | $143 |
| 50K | $148 |
| 100K | $248 |
| 150K | $498 |
| 250K | $898 |
For Option 2, the daily loss limits remain until the maximum-drawdown threshold reaches the starting balance; the public rule then says those daily limits are removed.
Master payout access is not immediate. The current help center requires at least ten individual trading days, a $1,000 minimum withdrawal, a safety reserve by account size, and a 40% consistency rule. Requests can be made during the month, but Bulenox says processing occurs weekly on Wednesdays. The first three requests are capped by account size; later requests have no published maximum. Those mechanics are mapped in the separate Bulenox Master payout guide and should not be compressed into “ten-day payouts.”
Master is not the same as live capital
Bulenox’s stage names need to remain separate:
- Qualification Account: The paid evaluation using Option 1 or Option 2.
- Master Account: The post-qualification performance stage with payout rules and the selected drawdown framework.
- Funded Account: The separate real-capital stage described on Bulenox’s Funded Account page.
Bulenox says that after three successful Master payouts, qualified traders may transition to a real-capital Funded Account, subject to the sole discretion of Risk Management. Active Master Accounts are then consolidated into one Funded Account, and the live stage uses published balance caps. A reward request on that Funded Account requires at least five trading days.
Three Master payouts are therefore a review threshold, not a guaranteed entitlement to live capital. A product comparison that calls the Master stage “live funded” would overstate the first-party record.
A practical choice for a 50K account
The 50K option makes the trade-off easy to see because both products cost $175 per month at list price, target $3,000, and use a $2,500 maximum drawdown.
Choose Option 1 if you can reliably control real-time peak-equity giveback and want access to all seven contracts without a separate $1,100 daily stop.
Choose Option 2 if you prefer a loss threshold based on end-of-day highs and can work within a starting two-contract limit, the scaling ladder, and the $1,100 daily loss control.
The headline drawdown dollars are identical. The timing of the threshold is not. For many traders, that timing difference will matter more than the account’s nominal balance.
Before buying
- Replay recent sessions and measure the largest giveback from unrealized peak to close. That is the key Option 1 stress test.
- Compare normal losing sessions with Option 2’s daily loss limit.
- Verify the starting scaling band, not only the maximum contract headline.
- Add the monthly subscription and one-time Master activation fee to the expected cost.
- Confirm the selected option, any public code, and checkout total before paying.
- Save the governing rule pages and purchase confirmation with the date.
- Treat Master and real-capital Funded stages as separate.
Current Firm Offers and Direct Links
Open the firm in a new tab with the recorded ComparePropFirms commercial link. Use the displayed code when applicable, and confirm the final price and terms before paying.
Official sources and verification
- Bulenox Qualification Account rules — checked July 31, 2026; source for trading hours, instruments, Option 1 real-time trailing mechanics, Option 2 EOD mechanics, scaling, daily loss limits, resets, and trading-day language
- Bulenox public enrollment form — checked July 31, 2026; source for currently enrollable 25K–250K sizes, list prices, targets, drawdowns, and maximum contract figures for both options
- Bulenox homepage — checked July 31, 2026; source for current public 50K and 100K promotional displays; not used as a checkout guarantee
- Bulenox Master Account rules — checked July 31, 2026; source for activation fees, drawdown lock, ten trading days, Wednesday processing, minimum and capped withdrawals, reserve, consistency, and profit split
- Bulenox Funded Account rules — checked July 31, 2026; source for the discretionary three-Master-payout real-capital transition, consolidation, balance caps, and five-day reward-request gate